Understanding FELA and BIA
Under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), a railroad has a duty to exercise ordinary care under the circumstances to provide its employees with a reasonably safe place within which to work.
Court decisions interpreting FELA have held that the railroads owe a duty to provide reasonably safe and suitable tools, machinery, and appliances with which to work; to regulate and monitor the performance of work to ensure safety precautions are practiced; and provide notice of potentially hazardous or dangerous situations and conditions.
In 1991, the Boiler Inspection Act (BIA) (also known as the Locomotive Inspection Act) was enacted. This statute, which applies principally to locomotive engineers and other operating department employees who must work in and on engine locomotives that are “in service” (not being repaired), imposed an absolute duty on a railroad carrier for violation of its requirements, which the railroad cannot escape by claiming that it exercised some degree of care.
The Act “imposes upon the carrier an absolute and continuing duty to maintain the locomotive and all parts and appurtenances thereof, in proper condition, and safe to operate… without unnecessary dangers to a persons body, limb or life.
The potential for the individual that had potentially contributory negligence can not be used as a defense or as an issue if the defendant is guilty of violating the statute, according to the BIA. It can be argued that cases of diesel exhaust exposure to railroad workers that the defendant railroad violated one or both of these Acts by failing to have the engine compartment windows and doors properly sealed so as to properly prevent the seepage of diesel exhaust fumes into the cab, or failing to install respirators, ventilators or properly working safety masks on units so as to protect the employees against continuous diesel exhaust exposure.
Additionally, it can be argued that a railroad in violation may have not provided enough training to workers as to the proper procedures when exposed to diesel exhaust or that the railroad is negligent in having a safety plan in place.
Statute of Limitations on FELA Actions for Diesel Exhaust Exposure
The statute of limitations on FELA cases is three years from the first date that the injured employee either actually knew of an injury or a potential injury, or should have known of the injury.
There have been cases where the employee knew or had some reason to know that they had a problem or which they or their doctor believed was caused by their work conditions. However, they reluctantly explained it to others and did not notify the railroad.
However, if the injured employee did not immediately give notice of the injury to the railroad, the railroad may be protected from litigation and additional legal action. Individuals who have previously suffered from diesel exhaust exposure, it is advisable to contact an attorney for development of a diesel exhaust exposure lawsuit.
——
LegalView offers additional resources on diesel exhaust exposure lawsuits and litigation at its homepage, http://diesel.legalview.com/. Also use LegalView’s vast array of legal topics to learn about the most controversial prescription drugs on the market such as Vytorin and Zetia or learn about the one of the newer practice areas found at http://baxter-heparin.legalview.com, which discusses Baxter Heparin’s side effects.
Written by Car Enthusiast on May 15th, 2008 with
no comments.
Read more articles on Automotive.
- [+] Digg: Feature this article
- [+] Del.icio.us: Bookmark this article
- [+] Furl: Bookmark this article
